CHAPTER 149 OF THE LAWS
C. F. ROWORTH LIMITED, 54,
[Appointed by the Government of
[1st January, 1931.]
1949 Cap. 192. 25 of 53. 7 of 56
To amend and consolidate the Law relating to Contract.
General rule of construction of Law.
(1) This Law shall be interpreted in accordance the principles of legal interpretation obtaining in England, and expressions used in it shall be presumed, so far as is consistent with their context, and except as may be otherwise expressly provided, to be used with the meaning attaching to them in English law and shall be construed in accordance therewith.
(a) when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal;
(d) when, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing, something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise;
Communication, acceptance and revocation of proposals.
3. The communication of proposals, the acceptance of proposals, and the revocation of proposals and acceptances, respectively, are deemed to be made by any act or omission of the party proposing, accepting or revoking by which he intends to communicate such proposal, acceptance or revocation, or which has the effect of communicating it.
Communication, when complete.
An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.
Revocation, how made.
(b) be expressed in some usual and reasonable manner, unless the proposal prescribes the manner in which it is to be accepted. If the proposal prescribes a manner in which it is to be accepted, and the acceptance is not made in such manner, the proposer may, within a reasonable time after the acceptance is communicated to him, insist that his proposal shall be accepted in the prescribed manner, and not otherwise; but if he fails to do so, he accepts the acceptance.
Promises, express and implied.
What agreements are contracts.
(1) All agreements are contracts if they are made the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be void, and may, subject to the provisions of this Law, be made in writing, or by word of mouth, or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth, or may be implied from the conduct of the parties.
(2) Nothing herein contained shall affect any
Law in force in
Capacity to contract. 2 of 7/56.
(1) Subject to the provisions of subsection (2), every person is competent to contract who-
(2) The law in force in
What is a sound mind for the purposes of contracting.
A person who is usually of unsound mind, but occasionally of sound mind, may make a contract when he is of sound mind.
A person who is usually of sound mind, but occasionally of unsound mind, may not make a contract when he is of unsound mind.
"Free consent" defined.
(a) coercion, as defined in section 15; or
(b) undue influence, as defined in section 16; or
(c) fraud, as defined in section 17; or
(d) misrepresentation, as defined in section 18; or
(1) "Coercion" is the committing or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Criminal Code, or any amendment thereof, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.
"Undue influence" defined.
(1) A contract is said to be induced by "undue influence" where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.
(3) Where a person who is in a position to dominate the will of another, enters into a contract with him, and the transaction appears, on the face of it or on the evidence adduced, to be unconscionable, the burden of proving that such contract was not induced by undue influence shall lie upon the person in a position to dominate the will of the other.
(1) "Fraud" includes any of the following acts committed by a party to a contract, or with his connivance, or by his agent, with intent to deceive another party thereto or his agent, or to induce him to enter into the contract-
(2) Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, regard being had to them, it is the duty of the person keeping silence to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.
(b) any breach of duty which, without an intent to deceive, gains an advantage to the person committing it, or any one claiming under him, by misleading another to his prejudice or to the prejudice of any one claiming under him;
(2) A party to a contract, whose consent was caused by fraud or misrepresentation, may, if he thinks fit, insist that the contract shall be performed, and that he shall be put in the position in which he would have been if the representations made had been true.
(3) If such consent was caused by misrepresentation or by silence, fraudulent within the meaning of section 17, the contract, nevertheless, is not voidable, if the party whose consent was so caused had the means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence.
(4) A fraud or misrepresentation which did not cause the consent to a contract of the party on whom such fraud was practised, or to whom such misrepresentation was made, does not render a contract voidable.
Power to set aside contract induced by undue influence.
(2) Any such contract may be set aside either absolutely or, if the party who was entitled to avoid it has received any benefit thereunder, upon such terms and conditions as to the Court may seem just.
Agreement void where both parties are under mistake as to matter of fact.
An erroneous opinion as to the value of the thing which forms the subject-matter of the agreement is not to be deemed a mistake as to a matter of fact.
Effect of mistakes as to law.
Contract caused by mistake of one party as to matter of fact.
What considerations and objects are lawful and what not.
Agreements void, if considerations and objects unlawful in part.
Agreement without consideration, void, unless it is in writing.
(a) it is expressed in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith, and is made on account of natural love and affection between parties standing in a near relation to each other; or unless
or is a promise to compensate for something done,
or is a promise to pay a debt, barred by limitation law.
(c) it is a promise, made in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith, to pay wholly or in part a debt of which the creditor might have enforced payment but for any law for the time being in force relating to prescription or the limitation of actions.
In any of these cases, such an agreement is a contract.
(3) An agreement to which the consent of the promisor is freely given is not void merely because the consideration is inadequate; but the inadequacy of the consideration may be taken into account by the Court in determining the question whether the consent of the promisor was freely given.
Agreement in restraint of marriage void.
Agreement in restraint of trade void.
Saving of agreement not to carry on business of which good-will is sold;
(a) One who sells the good-will of a business may agree with the buyer to refrain from carrying on a similar business, within specified local limits, so long as the buyer or any person deriving title to the good-will from him, carries on a like business therein: Provided that such limits appear to the Court reasonable, regard being had to the nature of the business;
of agreement between partners prior to dissolution.
(b) partners may, upon or in anticipation of a dissolution of the partnership, agree that some or all of them will not carry on a business similar to that of the partnership within such local limits as are referred to in the last preceding subsection;
or during continuance of partnership.
Agreements in restraint of legal proceedings void.
(1) Every agreement, by which any party thereto is restricted absolutely from enforcing his rights under or in respect of any contract, by the usual legal proceedings in the Courts, or which limits the time within which he may thus enforce his rights, is void to that extent.
Saving of contract to refer to arbitration dispute that may arise.
(2) This section shall not render illegal a contract by which two or more persons agree that any dispute which may arise between them in respect of any subject or class of subjects shall be referred to arbitration, and that only the amount awarded in such arbitration shall be recoverable in respect of the dispute so referred.
When such a contract has been made, legal proceedings may be brought for its specific performance, and if legal proceedings, other than for such specific performance, or for the recovery of the amount so awarded, are brought by one party to such contract against any other such party in respect of any subject which they have so agreed to refer, the existence of such contract shall be a bar to the legal proceedings.
Saving of contract to refer questions that have already arisen.
(3) This section shall not render illegal any contract in writing, by which two or more persons agree to refer to arbitration any question between them which has already arisen, or affect any provision of any law in force for the time being as to references to arbitration.
Agreements void for uncertainty.
Agreements by way of wager void.
30. Agreements by way of wager are void; and no legal proceedings shall be brought for recovering anything alleged to be won on any wager, or entrusted to any person to abide the result of any game or other uncertain event on which any wager is made.
"Contingent contract" defined.
Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event happening.
If the event becomes impossible, such contracts become void.
Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event not happening.
When contingency is the future conduct of a living person.
34. If the future event on which a contract is contingent is the way in which a person will act at an unspecified time, the event shall be considered to become impossible when such person does anything which renders it impossible that he should so act within any definite time, or otherwise than under further contingencies.
When contingency is the happening of specified event within fixed time.
(1) Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if a specified uncertain event happens within a fixed time become void if, at the expiration of the time fixed, such event has not happened, or if, before the time fixed, such event becomes impossible.
(2) Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if a specified uncertain event does not happen within a fixed time may be enforced by law when the time fixed has expired and such event has not happened, or, before the time fixed has expired, if it becomes certain that such event will not happen.
Agreement contingent on impossible events void.
36. Contingent agreements to do or not to do anything, if an impossible event happens, are void, whether the impossibility of the event is known or not to the parties to the agreement at the time when it is made.
Obligation of parties to contracts.
(1) The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of this Law, or of any other Law.
When promises binding on representatives of promisors.
Effect of refusal to accept offer of performance.
(1) Where a promisor has made an offer of performance to the promisee, and the offer has not been accepted, the promisor is not responsible for non-performance, nor does he thereby lose his rights under the contract.
(b) it must be made at a proper time and place, and under such circumstances that the person to whom it is made may have a reasonable opportunity of ascertaining that the person by whom it is made is able and willing there and then to do the whole of what he is bound by his promise to do;
(c) if the offer is an offer to deliver anything to the promisee, the promisee must have a reasonable opportunity of seeing that the thing offered is the thing which the promisor is bound by his promise to deliver.
39. When a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing, his promise in its entirety, the promisee may put an end to the contract, unless he has signified, by words or conduct, his acquiescence in its continuance.
Person by whom promise is to be performed.
40. If it appears from the nature of the case that it was the intention of the parties to any contract that any promise contained in it should be performed by the promisor himself, such promise must be performed by the promisor. In other cases, the promisor or his representatives may employ a competent person to perform it.
Effect of accepting performance from third person.
Devolution of joint liabilities.
42. When two or more persons have made a joint promise then unless a contrary intention appears by the contract, all such persons, during their joint lives, and after the death of any of them, his representative jointly with the survivor or survivors, and after the death of the last survivor, the representatives of all jointly, must fulfil the promise.
Any one of joint promisors may be compelled to perform.
(1) When two or more persons make a joint promise, the promisee may, in the absence of express agreement to the contrary, compel any one or more of such joint promisors to perform the whole of the promise.
Each promisor may compel contribution.
(2) Each of two or more joint promisors may compel every other joint promisor to contribute equally with himself to the performance of the promise, unless a contrary intention appears from the contract.
Sharing of loss by default in contribution.
(4) Nothing in this section shall prevent a surety from recovering from his principal, payments made by the surety on behalf of the principal, or entitle the principal to recover anything from the surety on account of payments made by the principal.
Effect of release of one joint promisor.
44. Where two or more persons have made a joint promise, a release of one of such joint promisors by the promisee does not discharge the other joint promisor or joint promisors; neither does it free the joint promisor so released from responsibility to the other joint promisor or joint promisors.
Devolution of joint rights.
45. When a person has made a promise to two or more persons jointly, then, unless a contrary intention appears from the contract, the right to claim performance rests, as between him and them, with them during their joint lives, and, after the death of any of them, with the representative of such deceased person jointly with the survivor or survivors, and, after the death of the last survivor, with the representatives of all jointly.
Time for performance of promise where no application is to be made and no time is specified.
46. Where, by the contract, a promisor is to perform his promise without application by the promisee, and no time for performance is specified, the engagement must be performed within a reasonable time.
The question "what is a reasonable time" is, in each particular case, a question of fact.
Time and place for performance of promise where time is specified and no application to be made.
47. When a promise is to be performed on a certain day, and the promisor has undertaken to perform it without application by the promisee, the promisor may perform it at any time during the usual hours of business on such day and at the place at which the promise ought to be performed.
Application for performance on certain day to be at proper time and place.
48. When a promise is to be performed on a certain day, and the promisor has not undertaken to perform it without application by the promisee, it is the duty of the promisee to apply for performance at a proper place and within the usual hours of business.
The question "what is a proper time and place" is, in each particular case, a question of fact.
Place for performance of promise where no application to be made and no place fixed for performance.
49. When a promise is to be performed without application by the promisee, and no place is fixed for the performance of it, it is the duty of the promisor to apply to the promisee to appoint a reasonable place for the performance of the promise, and to perform it at such place.
Performance in manner or at time prescribed or sanctioned by promise.
Promisor not bound to perform, unless reciprocal promisee ready and willing to perform.
Order of performance of reciprocal promises.
52. Where the order in which reciprocal promises are to be performed is expressly fixed by the contract, they shall be performed in that order; and, where the order is not expressly fixed by the contract, they shall be performed in that order which the nature of the transaction requires.
Liability of party preventing event on which contract is to take effect.
53. When a contract contains reciprocal promises, and one party to the contract prevents the other from performing his promise, the contract becomes voidable at the option of the party so prevented; and he is entitled to compensation from the other party for any loss which he may sustain in consequence of the non-performance of the contract.
Effect of default as to that promise which should be first performed in contract consisting of reciprocal promises.
54. When a contract consists of reciprocal promises, such that one of them cannot be performed, or that its performance cannot be claimed till the other has been performed, and the promisor of the promise last mentioned fails to perform it, such promisor cannot claim the performance of the reciprocal promise, and must make compensation to the other party to the contract for any loss which such other party may sustain by the non-performance of the contract.
Effect of failure to perform at fixed time, in contract in which time is essential.
(1) When a party to a contract promises to do a certain thing at or before a specified time, or certain things at or before specified times, and fails to do any such thing at or before the specified time, the contract, or so much of it as has not been performed, becomes voidable at the option of the promisee, if the intention of the parties was that time should be of the essence of the contract.
Effect of such failure when time is not essential.
(2) If it was not the intention of the parties that time should be of the essence of the contract, the contract does not become voidable by the failure to do such thing at or before the specified time; but the promisee is entitled to compensation from the promisor for any loss occasioned to him by such failure.
Effect of acceptance of performance at time other than that agreed upon.
(3) If, in case of a contract voidable on account of the promisor's failure to perform his promise at the time agreed, the promisee accepts performance of such promise at any time other than that agreed, the promisee cannot claim compensation for any loss occasioned by the non-performance of the promise at the time agreed, unless, at the time of such acceptance, he gives notice to the promisor of his intention to do so.
Agreement to do impossible act.
Contract to do act afterwards becoming impossible or unlawful.
(2) A contract to do an act which, after the contract is made, becomes impossible, or, by reason of some event which the promisor could not prevent, unlawful, becomes void when the act becomes impossible or unlawful.
Compensation for loss through non performance of act known to be impossible or unlawful.
(3) Where one person has promised to do something which he knew, or, with reasonable diligence, might have known, and which the promisee did not know to be impossible or unlawful, such promisor must make compensation to such promisee for any loss which such promisee sustains through the non-performance of the promise.
Reciprocal promise to do things legal, and also other things illegal.
57. Where persons reciprocally promise, firstly, to do certain things which are legal, and, secondly, under specified circumstances, to do certain other things which are illegal, the first set of promises is a contract, but the second is a void agreement.
Alternative promise, one branch being illegal.
Application of payment where debt to be discharged is indicated.
59. Where a debtor, owing several distinct debts to one-person, makes a payment to him, either with express intimation, or under circumstances implying that the payment is to be applied to the discharge of some particular debt, the payment, if accepted, must be applied accordingly.
Application of payment where debt to be discharged not indicated.
60. Where the debtor has omitted to intimate and there are no other circumstances indicating to which debt the payment is to be applied, the creditor may apply it at his discretion to any lawful debt actually due and payable to him from the debtor, whether its recovery is or is not barred by the law in force for the time being relating to prescription or the limitation of actions.
Application of payment where neither party appropriates.
61. Where neither party makes any appropriation the payment shall be applied in discharge of the debts in order of time, whether they are or are not barred by the law in force for the time being relating to prescription or the limitation of actions. If the debts are of equal standing, the payment shall be applied in discharge of each proportionably.
Effect of novation, rescission and alteration of contract.
Promisee may dispense with or remit performance of promise.
63. Every promisee may dispense with or remit, wholly or in part, the performance of the promise made to him, or may extend the time for such performance, or may accept instead of it any satisfaction which he thinks fit.
Consequences of rescission of voidable contract.
64. When a person at whose option a contract is voidable rescinds it, the other party thereto need not perform any promise therein contained in which he is promisor. The party rescinding a voidable contract shall, if he have received any benefit thereunder from another party to such contract, restore such benefit, so far as may be, to the person from whom it was received.
Obligation of person who has received advantage under void agreement or contract that becomes void.
65. When an agreement is discovered to be void, or when a contract becomes void, any person who has received any advantage under such agreement or contract is bound to restore it, or to make compensation for it, to the person from whom he received it.
Mode of communicating or revoking rescission of voidable contract.
Effect of neglect of promisee to afford promisor reasonable facilities for performance.
67. If any promisee neglects or refuses to afford the promisor reasonable facilities for the performance of his promise, the promisor is excused by such neglect or refusal as to any non-performance caused thereby.
Claim for necessaries supplied to person incapable of contracting, or on his account.
68. If a person, incapable of entering into a contract, or, any one whom he is legally bound to support, is supplied by another person with necessaries suited to his condition in life, the person who has furnished such supplies is entitled to be reimbursed from the property of such incapable person.
Reimbursement of person paying money due by another in payment of which he is interested.
Obligation of person enjoying benefit of non-gratuitous act.
70. Where a person lawfully does anything for another person, or delivers anything to him, not intending to do so gratuitously, and such other person enjoys the benefit thereof, the latter is bound to make compensation to the former in respect of, or to restore, the thing so done or delivered.
Responsibility of finder of goods.
Liability of person to whom money is paid, or thing delivered, by mistake or under coercion.
Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract.
(1) When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby, which naturally arose in the usual course of things from such breach, or which the parties knew, when they made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it.
Such compensation is not to be given for any remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach.
Compensation for failure to discharge obligations resembling those created by contract.
(2) When an obligation resembling those created by contract has been incurred and has not been discharged, any person injured by the failure to discharge it is entitled to receive the same compensation from the party in default, as if such person had contracted to discharge it and had broken his contract.
Existing means of remedy to be taken into account.
(3) In estimating the loss or damage arising from a breach of contract, the means which existed of remedying the inconvenience caused by the non-performance of the contract must be taken into account.
Compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated for.
(1) When a contract has been broken, if a sum is named in the contract as the amount to be paid in case of such breach, or if the contract contains any other stipulation by way of penalty, the party complaining of the breach is entitled, whether or not actual damage or loss is proved to have been caused thereby, to receive from the party who has broken the contract reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount so named or, as the case may be, the penalty stipulated for.
A stipulation for increased interest from the date of default may be a stipulation by way of penalty.
(2) When any person enters into any bailbond, recognisance or other instrument of the same nature, or, under the provisions of any Law, or under the orders of the Government of Cyprus, gives any bond for the performance of any public duty or act in which the public are interested, he shall be liable, upon breach of the condition of any such instrument, to pay the whole sum mentioned therein:
Party rightfully rescinding contract entitled to compensation.
Specific performance of contracts and requisites thereof.
(2) Nothing herein contained shall affect the
specific performance of contracts for the sale of immovable property under the
provisions of the
Requirements for leases and contracts made in consideration of marriage. 2 of 6'59.
(b) signed at the end thereof, in the presence of at least two witnesses themselves competent to contract who have subscribed their names as witnesses, by each party to be charged therewith or by a person who is himself competent to contract and who has been duly authorised to sign on behalf of such party.
(b) signed at the end thereof, in the presence of at least two witnesses themselves competent to contract who have subscribed their names as witnesses, by each party to be charged therewith or by a person who is himself competent to contract and who has been duly authorised to sign on behalf of such party:
"Bond in customary form," "Debtor" and "Creditor" defined, and essentials of bond.
The person who makes the promise is called the "debtor"; the person to whom the promise is made is called the "creditor."
Bond secured by guarantee, pledge or mortgage.
Conclusiveness of contents of bond.
Provided that in any such proceedings it shall be a good defence to prove that the signature of the debtor or of any other party to the bond is not in fact the signature of such debtor or party or that the bond has been obtained by, or in circumstances amounting to, coercion or fraud.
Right of indemnity-holder when sued:
(b) all costs which he may be compelled to pay in any such legal proceedings if, in bringing or defending them, he did not contravene the orders of the promisor, and acted as it would have been prudent for him to act in the absence of any contract of indemnity, or if the promisor authorised him to bring or defend the legal proceedings;
(c) all sums which he may have paid under the terms of any compromise of any such legal proceedings, if the compromise was not contrary to the orders of the promisor, and was one which it would have been prudent for the promisee to make in the absence of any contract of indemnity, or if the promisor authorised him to compromise the legal proceedings.
Consideration for guarantee.
Revocation of continuing guarantee.
Revocation of continuing guarantee by surety's death.
Liability of two persons, primarily liable, not affected by arrangement between them that one shall be surety on other's default.
90. Where two persons contract with a third person to undertake a certain liability, and also contract with each other that one of them shall be liable only on the default of the other, the third person not being a party to such contract, the liability of each of such two persons to the third person under the first contract is not affected by the existence of the second contract, although such third person may have been aware of its existence.
Discharge of surety by variance in terms of contract.
Discharge of surety by release or discharge of principal debtor.
92. The surety is discharged by any contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, by which the principal debtor is released, or by any act or omission of the creditor, the legal consequence of which is the discharge of the principal debtor.
Discharge of surety when creditor compounds with, gives time to, or agrees not to sue principal debtor.
Surety not discharged when agreement made with third person to give time to principal debtor.
Creditor's forbearance to sue does not discharge surety.
95. Mere forbearance on the part of the creditor to sue the principal debtor or to enforce any other remedy against him does not, in the absence of any provision in the guarantee to the contrary, discharge the surety.
Release of one co-surety does not discharge others.
Discharge of surety by creditor's act or omission impairing surety's eventual remedy.
97. If the creditor does any act which is inconsistent with the rights of the surety, or omits to do any act which his duty to the surety requires him to do, and the eventual remedy of the surety himself against the principal debtor is thereby impaired, the surety is discharged.
Rights of surety on payment or performance.
98. Where a guaranteed debt has become due, or default of the principal debtor to perform a guaranteed duty has taken place, the surety, upon payment or performance of all that he is liable for, is invested with all the rights which the creditor had against the principal debtor.
Surety's right to benefit of creditor's securities.
(1) A surety is entitled to the benefit of every security which the creditor has against the principal debtor at the time when the contract of suretyship is entered into, whether the surety knows of the existence of such security or not; and, if the creditor loses or, without the consent of the surety, parts with such security, the surety is discharged to the extent of the value of the security.
Saving. Cap. 6.
Guarantee obtained by misrepresentation invalid.
Guarantee obtained by concealment invalid.
Guarantee on contract that creditor shall not act on it until co-surety joins.
102. Where a person gives a guarantee upon a contract that the creditor shall not act upon it until another person has joined in it as co-surety, the guarantee is not valid if that other person does not join.
Implied promise to indemnify surety.
Co-sureties liable to contribute equally.
104. Where two or more persons are co-sureties for the same debt or duty, either jointly or severally, and whether under the same or different contracts, and whether with or without the knowledge of each other, the co-sureties, in the absence of any contract to the contrary, are liable, as between themselves, to pay each an equal share of the whole debt, or of that part of it which remains unpaid by the principal debtor.
Liability of co-sureties bound in different sums.
"Goods," "company," "bailment," "bailor," and "bailee" defined.
(a) "goods" means every kind of movable property and includes bills of exchange, promissory notes, bonds whether in customary form or not other than those secured by mortgage of immovable property, share certificates or share warrants for shares in a company;
"company" means a limited liability company formed under the provisions of the Companies Law, or any amendment thereof, or an anonyme company originally formed under the provisions of the Ottoman Commercial Code;
(b) a "bailment" is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the directions of the person delivering them. The person delivering the goods is called the "bailor." The person to whom they are delivered is called the "bailee."
(2) If a person already in possession of the goods of another contracts to hold them as a bailee, he thereby becomes the bailee, and the owner becomes the bailor, of such goods although they may not have been delivered by way of bailment.
107. The delivery to the bailee may be made by doing anything which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the intended bailee or of any person authorised to hold them on his behalf.
Bailor's duty to disclose faults in goods bailed.
(1) The bailor is bound to disclose to the bailee faults in the goods bailed, of which the bailor is aware, and which materially interfere with the use of them, or expose the bailee to extraordinary risks; and, if he does not make such disclosure, he is responsible for damage arising to the bailee directly from such faults.
Care to be taken by bailee.
Bailee when not liable for loss, etc., of thing bailed.
110. The bailee, in the absence of any special contract, is not responsible for the loss, destruction or deterioration of the thing bailed, if he has taken the amount of care of it described in the last preceding section.
Termination of bailment by bailee's act inconsistent with conditions.
Liability of bailee making unauthorised use of goods bailed.
112. If the bailee makes any use of the goods bailed, which is not according to the conditions of the bailment, he is liable to make compensation to the bailor for any damage arising to the goods from or during such use of them.
Effect of mixture, with bailor's consent, of his goods with bailee's.
113. If the bailee, with the consent of the bailor, mixes the goods of the bailor with his own goods, the bailor and the bailee shall have an interest, in proportion to their respective shares, in the mixture thus produced.
Effect of mixture, without bailor's consent, when the goods can be separated.
114. If the bailee, without the consent of the bailor, mixes the goods of the bailor with his own goods, and the goods can be separated or divided, the property in the goods remains in the parties respectively; but the bailee is bound to bear the expense of separation or division, and any damage arising from the mixture.
Effect of mixture, without bailor's consent, when the goods cannot be separated.
115. If the bailee, without the consent of the bailor, mixes the goods of the bailor with his own goods, in such a manner that it is impossible to separate the goods bailed from the other goods and deliver them back, the bailor is entitled to be compensated by the bailee for the loss of the goods.
Repayment by bailor of necessary expenses.
116. Where, by the conditions of the bailment, the goods are to be kept or to be carried, or to have work done upon them by the bailee for the bailor, and the bailee is to receive no remuneration, the bailor shall repay to the bailee the necessary expenses incurred by him for the purpose of the bailment.
Restoration of goods lent gratuitously.
117. The lender of a thing for use may at any time require its return, if the loan was gratuitous, even though he lent it for a specified time or purpose. But, if, on the faith of such loan made for a specified time or purpose, the borrower has acted in such a manner that the return of the thing lent before the time agreed upon would cause him loss exceeding the benefit actually derived by him from the loans, the lender must, if he compels the return, indemnify the borrower for the amount in which the loss so occasioned exceeds the benefit so derived.
Return of goods bailed on expiration of time or accomplishment of purpose.
118. It is the duty of the bailee to return, or deliver according to the bailor's directions, the goods bailed, without demand, as soon as the time for which they were bailed has expired, or the purpose for which they were bailed has been accomplished.
Bailee's responsibility when goods are not duly returned.
119. If, by the default of the bailee, the goods are not returned, delivered or tendered at the proper time, he is responsible to the bailor for any loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods from that time.
Termination of gratuitous bailment by death.
Bailor entitled to increase or profit from goods bailed.
Bailor's responsibility to bailee.
122. The bailor is responsible to the bailee for any loss which the bailee may sustain by reason that the bailor was not entitled to make the bailment, or to receive back the goods or to give directions respecting them.
Bailment by several joint owners.
123. If several joint owners of goods bail them, the bailee may deliver them back to, or according to the directions of, one joint owner without the consent of all, in the absence of any agreement to the contrary.
Bailee not responsible on re-delivery to bailor without title.
124. If the bailor has no title to the goods, and the bailee, in good faith, delivers them back to, or according to the directions of, the bailor, the bailee is not responsible to the owner in respect of such delivery.
Right of third person claiming goods bailed.
Right of finder of goods; may sue for specific reward offered.
126. The finder of goods has no right to sue the owner for compensation for trouble and expense voluntarily incurred by him to preserve the goods and to find out the owner; but he may retain the goods against the owner until he receives such compensation; and, where the owner has offered a specific reward for the return of goods lost, the finder may sue for such reward, and may retain the goods until he receives it.
When finder of thing commonly on sale may sell it.
127. When a thing which is commonly the subject of sale is lost, if the owner cannot with reasonable diligence be found, or if he refuses, upon demand, to pay the lawful charges of the finder, the finder may sell it-
128. Where the bailee has, in accordance with the purpose of the bailment, rendered any service involving the exercise of labour or skill in respect of the goods bailed, he has, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, a right to retain such goods until he receives due remuneration for the services he has rendered in respect of them.
General lien of bankers, factors and wharfingers.
129. Bankers, factors and wharfingers, may, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, retain, as a security for a general balance of account, any goods bailed to them; but no other persons have a right to retain, as a security for such balance, goods bailed to them, unless there is an express contract to that effect.
"Pledge," "pawnor" and "pawnee" defined.
Pawnee's right of retainer.
131. The pawnee may retain the goods pledged, not only for payment of the debt or the performance of the promise, but for the interest of the debt, and all necessary expenses incurred by him in respect of the possession or for the preservation of the goods pledged.
Pawnee not to retain for debt or promise other than that for which goods pledged. Presumption in case of subsequent advances.
132. The pawnee shall not, in the absence of a contract to that effect, retain the goods pledged for any debt or promise other than the debt or promise for which they are pledged; but such contract, in the absence of anything to the contrary, shall be presumed in regard to subsequent advances made by the pawnee.
Pawnee's right as to extraordinary expenses incurred.
Pawnee's right where pawnor makes default.
(1) If the pawnor makes default in payment of the debt, or performance, at the stipulated time of the promise, in respect of which the goods were pledged, the pawnee may bring legal proceedings against the pawnor upon the debt or promise, and retain the goods pledged as a collateral security; or he may sell the thing pledged, on giving the pawnor reasonable notice of the sale.
(2) If the proceeds of such sale are less than the amount due in respect of the debt or promise, the pawnor is still liable to pay the balance. If the proceeds of the sale are greater than the amount so due, the pawnee shall pay over the surplus to the pawnor.
Defaulting pawnor's right to redeem.
135. If a time is stipulated for the payment of the debt, or performance of the promise, for which the pledge is made, and the pawnor makes default in payment of the debt or performance of the promise at the stipulated time, he may redeem the goods pledged at any subsequent time before the actual sale of them; but he must, in that case, pay, in addition, any expenses which have arisen from his default.
Pledge by possessor of goods, or of documentary title to goods.
Provided also that such goods or documents have not been obtained from their lawful owner, or from any person in lawful custody of them, by means of an offence or fraud.
Pledge where pawnor has only a limited interest.
Requirements for a pledge of bills of exchange, promissory notes, etc.
(a) bills of exchange, or
(b) promissory notes, or
(c) bonds, whether in customary form or not, other than those secured by mortgage of immovable property, or
(d) share certificates or share warrants for shares in a company, as security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise,
shall not be valid and enforceable unless the contract of pledge-
(i) is expressed in writing, and
(ii) is signed at the end thereof by the pawnor, and
(iii) is made in the presence of at least two witnesses themselves competent to contract and subscribed by them with their names as witnesses.
Additional requirements for pledge of shares.
(2) A pledge of share certificates or share warrants for shares in a company transferable otherwise than by delivery shall not be valid and enforceable unless, in addition to the requirements of the preceding subsection-
Legal proceedings by bailor or bailee against wrong-doer.
140. If a third person wrongfully deprives the bailee of the use or possession of the goods bailed, or does them any injury, the bailee is entitled to use such remedies as the owner might have used in the like case if no bailment had been made; and either the bailor or the bailee may bring legal proceedings against a third person for such deprivation or injury.
Apportionment of relief or compensation obtained by such legal proceedings.
"Agent" and "principal" defined.
142. An "agent" is a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons. The person for whom such act is done, or who is so represented, is called the "principal."
Who may employ agent.
Who may be an agent.
144. As between the principal and third persons any person may become an agent, but no person who is not competent to contract can become an agent, so as to be responsible to his principal according to the provisions in that behalf herein contained.
Consideration not necessary.
Agent's authority may be expressed or implied.
Definitions of express and implied authority.
147. An authority is said to be express when it is given by words spoken or written. An authority is said to be implied when it is to be inferred from the circumstances of the case; and things spoken or written, or the ordinary course of dealing, may be accounted circumstances of the case.
Extent of agent's authority.
Agent's authority in an emergency.
149. An agent has authority, in an emergency, to do all such acts for the purpose of protecting his principal from loss as would be done by a person of ordinary prudence, in his own case, under similar circumstances.
When agent cannot delegate.
150. An agent cannot lawfully employ another to perform acts which he has expressly or impliedly undertaken to perform personally, unless by the ordinary custom of trade a sub-agent may, or, from the nature of the agency, a sub-agent must, be employed.
Representation of principal by sub-agent properly appointed.
(1) When a sub-agent is properly appointed, the principal is, so far as regards third persons, represented by the sub-agent, and is bound by and responsible for his acts, as if he were an agent originally appointed by the principal.
Agent's responsibility for sub-agent.
Agent's responsibility for sub-agent appointed without authority.
153. Where an agent, without having authority to do so, has appointed a person to act as a sub-agent, the agent stands towards such person in the relation of a principal to an agent, and is responsible for his acts both to the principal and to third persons; the principal is not represented by or responsible for the acts of the person so employed, nor is that person responsible to the principal.
Relation between principal and person duly appointed by agent to act in business of agency.
154. Where an agent, holding an express or implied authority to name another person to act for the principal in the business of the agency, has named another person accordingly, such person is not a sub-agent, but an agent of the principal for such part of the business of the agency as is entrusted to him.
Agent's duty in naming such person.
Right of person as to acts done for him without his authority Effect of ratification.
156. Where acts are done by one person on behalf of another, but without his knowledge or authority, he may elect to ratify or to disown such acts. If he ratify them, the same effects will follow as if they had been performed by his authority.
Ratification may be expressed or implied.
Knowledge requisite for valid ratification.
Effect of ratifying unauthorised act forming part of a transaction.
Ratification of unauthorised act cannot injure third person.
160. An act done by one person on behalf of another, without such other person's authority, which, if done with authority, would have the effect of subjecting a third person to damages, or of terminating any right or interest of a third person, cannot, by ratification, be made to have such effect.
Termination of agency.
161. An agency is terminated by the principal revoking his authority; or by the agent renouncing the business of the agency; or by the business of the agency being completed; or by either the principal or agent dying or becoming of unsound mind; or by the principal being adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent under the provisions of any Law for the time being in force relating to bankruptcy or insolvency.
Termination of agency, where agent has an interest in subject-matter.
162. Where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency cannot, in the absence of an express contract, be terminated to the prejudice of such interest.
When principal may revoke agent's authority.
163. The principal may, save as is otherwise provided by the last preceding section, revoke the authority given to his agent at any time before the authority has been exercised so as to bind the principal.
Revocation where authority has been partly exercised.
164. The principal cannot revoke the authority given to his agent after the authority has been partly exercised so far as regards such acts and obligations as arise from acts already done in the agency.
Compensation for revocation by principal or renunciation by agent.
165. Where there is an express or implied contract that the agency should be continued for any period of time, the principal must make compensation to the agent, or the agent to the principal, as the case may be, for any previous revocation or renunciation of the agency without sufficient cause.
Notice of revocation or renunciation.
166. Reasonable notice must be given of such revocation or renunciation; otherwise the damage thereby resulting to the principal or the agent, as the case may be, must be made good to the one by the other.
Revocation and renunciation may be expressed or implied.
When termination of agent's authority takes effect as to agent, and as to third persons.
168. The termination of the authority of an agent does not, so far as regards the agent, take effect before it becomes known to him, or, so far as regards third persons, before it becomes known to them.
Agent's duty on termination of agency by principal's death or insanity.
169. When an agency is terminated by the principal dying or becoming of unsound mind, the agent is bound to take, on behalf of the representatives of his late principal, all reasonable steps for the protection and preservation of the interests entrusted to him.
Termination of sub-agent's authority.
170. The termination of the authority of an agent causes the termination (subject to the rules herein contained regarding the termination of an agent's authority) of the authority of all sub-agents appointed by him.
Agent's duty in conducting principal's business.
171. An agent is bound to conduct the business of his principal according to the directions given by the principal, or, in the absence of any such directions, according to the custom which prevails in doing business of the same kind at the place where the agent conducts such business. When the agent acts otherwise, if any loss be sustained, he must make it good to his principal, and, if any profit accrues, he must account for it.
Skill and diligence required from agent.
172. An agent is bound to conduct the business of the agency with as much skill as is generally possessed by persons engaged in similar business, unless the principal has notice of his want of skill. The agent is always bound to act with reasonable diligence, and to use such skill as he possesses; and to make compensation to his principal in respect of the direct consequences of his own neglect want of skill or misconduct, but not in respect of loss or damage which are indirectly or remotely caused by such neglect, want of skill or misconduct.
Agent's duty to communicate with principal.
Right of principal when agent deals on his own account, in business of agency without principal's consent.
175. If an agent deals on his own account in the business of the agency, without first obtaining the consent of his principal and acquainting him with all material circumstances which have come to his own knowledge on the subject, the principal may repudiate the transaction, if the case shows either that any material fact has been dishonestly concealed from him by the agent, or that the dealings of the agent have been disadvantageous to him.
Principal's right to benefit gained by agent dealing on his own account in business of agency.
176. If an agent, without the knowledge of his principal, deals in the business of the agency on his own account instead of on account of his principal, the principal is entitled, notwithstanding anything contained in Part VIII of this Law, to claim from the agent any benefit which may have resulted to him from the transaction.
Agent's right of retainer out of sums received on principal's account.
177. An agent may retain, out of any sums received on account of the principal in the business of the agency all moneys due to himself in respect of advances made or expenses properly incurred by him in conducting such business, and also such remuneration as may be payable to him for acting as agent.
Agent's duty to pay sums received for principal.
When agent's remuneration becomes due.
Agent not entitled to remuneration for business misconducted.
Agent's lien on principal's property.
Agent to be indemnified against consequences of lawful acts.
Agent to be indemnified against consequences of acts done in good faith.
183. Where one person employs another to do an act, and the agent does the act in good faith, the employer is liable to indemnify the agent against the consequences of that act, though it cause an injury to the rights of third persons.
Non-liability of employer of agent to do a criminal act.
184. Where one person employs another to do an act which is criminal, the employer is not liable to the agent, either upon an express or an implied promise, to indemnify him against the consequences of that act.
Compensation to agent for injury caused by principal's neglect.
Enforcement and consequences of agent's contracts.
186. Contracts entered into through an agent, and obligations arising from acts done by an agent, may be enforced in the same manner, and will have the same legal consequences, as if the contracts had been entered into and the acts done by the principal in person.
Principal how far bound when agent exceeds authority.
187. When an agent does more than he is authorised to do, and when the part of what he does, which is within his authority, can be separated from the part which is beyond his authority, so much only of what he does as is within his authority is binding as between him and his principal.
Principal not bound when excess of agent's authority is not separable.
188. Where an agent does more than he is authorised to do, and what he does beyond the scope of his authority cannot be separated from what is within it, the principal is not bound to recognise the transaction.
Consequences of notice given to agent.
189. Any notice given to or information obtained by the agent, provided it be given or obtained in the course of the business transacted by him for the principal, shall, as between the principal and third parties, have the same legal consequences as if it had been given to or obtained by the principal.
Agent cannot personally enforce, nor be bound by contracts on behalf of principal. Presumption of contract to contrary.
(1) If an agent makes a contract with a person who neither knows, nor has reason to suspect, that he is an agent, his principal may require the performance of the contract; but the other contracting party has, as against the principal, the same rights as he would have had as against the agent if the agent had been principal.
Where principal discloses himself before completion of contract.
(2) If the principal discloses himself before the contract is completed, the other contracting party may refuse to fulfil the contract, if he can show that, if he had known who was the principal in the contract, or if he had known that the agent was not a principal, he would not have entered into the contract.
Performance of contract with agent supposed to be principal.
192. Where one man makes a contract with another, neither knowing nor having reasonable ground to suspect that the other is an agent, the principal, if he requires the performance of the contract, can only obtain such performance subject to the rights and obligations subsisting between the agent and the other party to the contract.
Right of person dealing with agent personally liable.
Consequence of inducing agent or principal to act on belief that principal or agent will be held exclusively liable.
194. When a person who has made a contract with an agent induces the agent to act upon the belief that the principal only will be held liable, or induces the principal to act upon the belief that the agent only will be held liable, he cannot afterwards hold liable the agent or principal respectively.
Liability of pretended agent.
Person falsely contracting as agent not entitled to performance.
Liability of principal inducing belief that agent's unauthorised acts were authorised.
197. When an agent has, without authority, done acts or incurred obligations to third persons on behalf of his principal, the principal is bound by such acts or obligations if he has by his words or conduct induced such third persons to believe that such acts and obligations were within the scope of the agent's authority.
Effect, on agreement, of misrepresentation or fraud by agent.
198. Misrepresentations made, or frauds committed, by agents acting in the course of their business for their principals, have the same effect on agreements made by such agents as if such misrepresentations or frauds had been made or committed by the principals; but misrepresentations made, or frauds committed, by agents, in matters which do not fall within their authority, do not affect their principals.
Section 247 of this Law which repealed the Commercial Code (Amendment) Law 1917 and some provisions of the Mejelle and the Ottoman Commercial Code, provided that such repeal should not, and that nothing in the Law should, affect:-
Primary Source: http://www.wipo.int/clea/en/text_html.jsp?lang=EN&id=928
Copyright © KrAn. 2004-2021. All rights reserved.